Skip to content
Lexyno

Evidence-grade demand workflow

Every fact.
Connected to its source.

Turn case records into a demand package your team can verify.

Before the demand goes out, check the facts behind it.

For small personal injury teams reviewing medical records and demand letters.

Review the treatment timeline, inspect the supporting pages, and decide what belongs in the demand.

Evaluate one real case

Start with your firm details. We review your request before sharing access instructions. Do not submit case files with this request.

Your firm verifies, decides, and releases.

Source record · page 42

Orthopedic follow-up

Patient: Jane A. Smith
Midtown Orthopedics
Record: MED-0038476

The patient presented for follow-up evaluation of left knee pain and catching with stairs.

Objective examination: Left knee effusion with medial joint line tenderness.

Assessment: left knee sprain, suspected medial meniscus tear. Findings remain subject to counsel review.

Source-linked chronology

Follow-up orthopedic evaluation

Left knee effusion with medial joint line tenderness.

MED-0038476 · p. 42
Illustrative / Synthetic — not a real matter.

Follow one fact

The source stays with the story.

From the original record to the reviewed draft.

Check the source page. Review the draft. Counsel decides what moves forward.

Supporting pageMED-0038476 · p. 42
Source record · page 42

Orthopedic follow-up

Patient: Jane A. Smith
Midtown Orthopedics
Record: MED-0038476

The patient presented for follow-up evaluation of left knee pain and catching with stairs.

Objective examination: Left knee effusion with medial joint line tenderness.

Assessment: left knee sprain, suspected medial meniscus tear. Findings remain subject to counsel review.

Illustrative / Synthetic — not a real matter.

SourceSource available

Original record

Start with the supporting page.

Read the original finding in context. The document ID and page number stay attached to the fact.

ChronologyAug 12, 2026

Source-linked chronology

Follow-up orthopedic evaluation

Left knee effusion with medial joint line tenderness.

Counsel reviewCounsel review required

Counsel decision

Your team decides what carries forward.

Review the finding against the original record. Decide whether to include it, exclude it, or develop it further.

This example does not approve or release work. Counsel makes that decision.

Demand excerptCounsel-approved example

IV. Injuries and treatment

The reviewed fact, in the draft.

The follow-up examination documented left knee effusion with medial joint line tenderness.

Illustrative workflow. Counsel approval is an explicit review step.

See your case file.
Trace every decision.

Evaluate one real case

Your firm verifies, decides, and releases.